Tom Coon-ery

See this Dumb SH!T
(bottom right hand corner)

Word is that this has been making rounds on the "Chain Letter E-Mail circuit".

I know what your thinking...
Why haven't I seen it yet?"



Why have you not seen this yet and its been passed around in those annoying Email chin letters?


but dont ask yourself that question because you already know why


Start with Blog post and them Pop Bloggers

I know post are now getting few and far between but there is always room for Link Love...

I have to start with my mans Pyrimidwest , with his raw exclusive interview of black celebs. Back in February he sat down with Ace Hood. Then a few days ago he dropped an excellent interview of Eddie Griffin. followed by one hot off the pressed with Pharrell.

MzVirgo, of mzvirgo.com, been holding it down as well, Did you know Rick Ross wears fake Loui V? and one of them tacky girls from "Flavor of Love", Saaphyri got 3 YEARS - good LAWD thats a lot of time!

Thats all I got for today, for the other just check out my blog roll

And you can catch me on twitter >>> http://twitter.com/dafonzarelli

Dafonzarelli Makievelli



Scrap Blogging

I thought I'd post this AGAIN since sring break is over now.




First Let me say...


And I have 1 simple questions to you...

Would you want to own one of these?


Myspace added a music label

and now they offering up a credit card?

Whats next?

MySpace Porn? (click with CAUTION!)


Word of the Week: Vernal

Vernal -

1. of or pertaining to spring; springlike

2. belonging to or characteristic of youth

Winter comes in to make nature nocturnal
Then Spring brings forth an awakening diurnal
The flowers begin to bloom
Tree buds pop like a kernel
Out of mother natures womb
All life becomes vernal

(click play!) AND

Spring awakens young Americans libido
Beaches full of hormone raging people
Bikini tops, Flip Flops and booty revealing thongs
MAN! what took spring time so long
Body rockin', P-poppin' on a hand stand
Where Am I?
Why Am I Naked?
And who the hell is Stan?
Sleep it off
Wake up






Remember back in the 1900's when this was the fashion

And showing these was a "strip-tease"

Check out the ankles on that trollop

Then the war came and they was a shortage on fabric...
So shins and forearms went bare

Can't forget about the flappers...

By the time the 1950's arrived we got to see these

And This

Stay with me people I'm going somewhere with this

Now a days we get to see women in this "fashion"




Its overly sectarian to be judgmental of a woman showing her ARMS when showing your ASS CRACK is part of today's fashion. Where did the world go wrong?


Word of the Week: Synergistic

Synergistic - pertaining to, characteristic of, or resembling the interaction of elements that when combined produce a total effect that is greater than the sum of the individual elements, contributions, ect.

or simply...

the cooperative action of two things to produce an effect greater than the sum of their individual effects.

Synergy, or synergism, for the most part, pertains to a scientific effect on chemicals and/or muscles. I perceive synergy just as applicable to sociological interaction, or how we get along with others.


This is regardless of personal feelings for another person. There may be situation where a person that you get along with, or are fond of, but can never accomplish a meaningful task with this person. On the flip side, there are people who you may find annoying, or just do not like, but will have an uncanny ability to work well together and get things done. This is not to say that the opposite can not be true for both statements.

So for this week draw awareness of your synergy and identify the persons whom, when you form cooperative action with, help you to produce a greater effect than you on your own...

and the persons that cause you a lesser effect than you on your own.

is out!!!!



Miseducation 101: For The Haters

Alright Class Gather 'round as I contunie to expound on the Haterism Phenomenon...

For this lesson we will concentrate on the "for the haters" comments and actions.

Lately I've discovered that when people do things that are "for the haters", oppose to being for "A" hater, they tend to get into a little bit of trouble. The trouble comes from "the haters", which is general or generic, is not aimed at a particular person. See, you can not blanket haters because they like to be identified. So in essence you have to call the hater out - I mean, call "A" hater out.

Basically, Not for THE haters, but aim at "A" hater - you have to be more specific.

This video is a perfect example...

Exactly, Misconstrued is right Mr Juelz Santana

I totally agree that using the internet for spewing hate is an act of "gayness"(what is gayness or "acting gay" is a whole 'nutha topic). Problem is you can NOT get mad at a specific person(hater) then make a generalization about all people who hate.

Thats the trap!

We do not want to identify the specific person because we do not want to give that hater unjust publicity. At the same time, we want to subliminally admonish the embellishment of haters by , as stated by Juelz Santana, letting them fuel your energy, building off their hate, and other such statements. Thats an oxymoron if I ever seen one, its very self-contradictory and leads to these "misconstruments"(yeah I made that word up, its the Jessie Jackson in me).

Giving haters all this "praise" without proper recognition, is Mad, I tell you MAD. That like the Grammy's or Oscar's only announcing the nominees and not having an awards show. Like, these people deserve awards but lets not pick a winner.

Here is another example of a "recantation of hateration"
(if this video does not work complain to the website linked above)

Actually, if the video is not working Keri Hilson probably does not want people to keep listening to her back pettle (like beep beep beep beep beep).

So lets not do it to ourselves, if you see a hater "point 'em out, point 'em out". If you dont theses seemingly pointed generalizations will tranfsorm into misconstruments that will screw you - EVERYTIME. Then you'll have to make a Recantation of Hateration, that will have you back peedling like "go go beep beep".

If you dont want to "name names" at least name the "hoish" or "gayn" or "bitchass" activity that was committed - that way you dont get UNWANTED haters "fueling your energy", "motivating you", "giving you ennergy to build off of", or making you GO GO! BEEP BEEP!

Haters make you GO! GO! Beep! Beep!


Tom COONery

See, this that BULLSH*T

And here is the degenerate mind that formed such a dubious peice of crap...

Brett Noel

May he soon be conflicted with ARThritis

Word of the Week: Specious

Specious -

1. apparently good or right though lacking real merit; superficially pleasing or plausible: specious arguments.
2. pleasing to the eye but deceptive.


Leading into the current economic crisis, many banks gave out specious loans to home buyers, where the loans looked to be affordable but in the end were not.

I acknowledge that the solution should overshadow the problem but sometime we need to find the source of the problem in order to find the proper solution.


AinThissaBowda: AIG(arrogance, incompetence and greed)

NOTICE: I do not break the news, meaning, I am not attempting to give you new information that you may not know. What I DO is BUST THE NEWS. This may be what you know but I'm going to tell you what you don't know - and drop my Ghetto Psychoanalytical Philosophy on dat azz...

I should of just call this post WHAT THE FCUK!

I know that most are already aware of the company AIG and the bonus crap so I do not have to go into details on that. What it comes down to is this

The information that these bonuses were coming up was out there. Thing is AIG got blasted last fall for their spa retreat booty meet junket, Wells Fargo was forced to cancel there Las Vega freakfest they had planed in February and Shitibank, I mean, Citibank had to forego their plans to purchase a mile high club magnet of a jet, in January. I guess we can say that AIG was already forewarned. After they got lashing in November, they also got to see 2 more examples in January and February. Also, there has been talk about the ridiculous bonuses that CEO's and such have been receiving - along with the talk about stoping it.


I'm glad AIG were such idiots because now President Obama has his team working on a remedy for theses such situations. This is exactly what needed to happen because for many years this has been going on, CEO's have been stackin then packin like that was the job.

I mean, what does it take to become a CEO of a company?

How do you get paid based on performance but even if you do not perform well you still get a bonus. That is NOT the definition of an incentive. An Incentive is to encourage a better effort or reward progress. It is quite obvious that AIG has not progressed but rather digressed. I can not, for the life of me, wrap my brain around the concept that theses people would still be entitled to a bonus.

They helped bankrupt a company and the company rewards them for doing that?

By giving them millions or dollars?

What the hell was written in those contracts?

No matter what you will be richer next year?

How can that be justified?


And You Know Thissss

President Obama just finished doing a town hall meeting in Costa Mesa, California. It was awesome as usual, i guess nothing less is reasonably to be expected. What drew focus to me was the Q & A portion, particularly his answer to the housing market question. In his answer he displayed why he was able to win the election in November with his savvy and ability to make complex situation plain to the common person.

Thing is with this sub-prime mortgage lending, that some people want to blame it on the government making banks give loans to low income families. Its disturbing because those same people think they have it pegged but they have yet to scratch the surface. True as it may be that banks were made to give sub-prime loans, they were not made to inflate those loans. Everytime I have a conversation about this I have to break this down, similarly to like President Obama.

Essentially, since the banks were made to give these loans they started making people by homes.
Now about this time I always get the "people should not have bought houses that could not afford" statement, which is true; But what person, in their right mind, who works everyday and has been working for YEARS, is going to turn down their opportunity to finally own a home?

Fact is most people do not understand interest rates and refinancing, all they know is how much they have to pay, each month, and for how long. You think these people were told for the first 2-3 years they will pay $500 a month, then after that it will increase to upwards of $1500?

The answer is NO

People fail to understand that this whole banking situation is going to cause necessary parameters to be set up. It reminds me of what happen with the "buyer beware" practices of many moons ago - late 1800's early 1900's. Before things like consumer protection laws and better business bureaus, it was up to the consumer to fully inspect a product they wanted to buy. It was believe that products would be produced for quality and not just to get a quick buck. We know how that went, that is why the consumer protection laws came about.

That was when GOODS were the prime assets. At that time services were not so much covered and a hundred years later, now that SERVICES(like providing mortgages) are more prominent than GOODS, we need similar laws in place. This also encompasses Presidents Obama's mention of credit cards, again more banking stuff.

What is to come is simplifications in banking services and their products i.e. mortgages and credit cards. It will be great for banks to have to fully disclose what an adjustable rate is and means for your pocket. That way people will not "buy houses they can not afford" and if they can afford it when they get it they will be able to continue to afford it...

as long as they still work, of course.



MisEducation 101: Hi Hater


Class is back in session and the focus for today will be the Phenomenon known as "the hater" (aka da hay-duh).

On the blog Diamond Dust, A. Smith, spoke about haters and how it seems that when one does not want to directly "call out" a person, they say "its just a hater" or "its about the haters" or even "I do it for MY haters".

It seems to be an obsession, these days, to have this mythical nondescript syndicate(hay-duhs) whose sole purpose is to be the source of blame in ones life.

HUH? Let me break it down...

The Obsession

Obsession is the controlling of emotions, or thoughts, by a desire of achievement.

Thoughts and emotions are controlled by the word hater. If a person is deemed a hater, immediately, others perception of that person becomes skewed and obscure. Regardless of the credibility of the person calling out the hater, people still tend to hold the comment as truth. If you do not want someone to like another person just say that person is a hater.

Along with this conditioning of the mind is the goal of achieving the "sideline of haters". There is this growing desire to obtain as many haters as possible or to label any one who does not accept your 'swagger' as a hater. Though it should be known that every one will not perceive you as you do yourself, the mind set is that whoever does not is a hater. In short, any one not 'singing your praises' is a hater - regardless of truth.

The Mythical Nondescript Syndicate

Who is a hater, exactly? Other than unjust finger pointing, what identifies a hater?

When one says 'the haters' it is as if there referring to 'the spirits' or 'the man' - as in, its more of a representative group than actual tangible people. Haters are mythical in the sense of this false belief that created this normative system. I mean, there is not a group of people that will say we are 'the haters', no, the group will always form as 'the hateD'; But not in a victimized manner, more so as an astute group of individuals.

Again there is no clear cut way, outside of finger pointing, to depict, or describe, a hater. Nothing is out there to distinguish a hater.

Is it the way they look? Is it the way that talk? Who knows?

The Source of Blame

So, why are people infatuated with having this fictitious group? Blame is the reason.

The term hater(s) has become abstractly allegorical, meaning there is nothing of substance to back haterism. Its only an emblamatic semblance, giving a look on the surface to be the cause of another (a hater) but inwardly being ones self - or ones inner struggle with self.

If haters are a negative vice in ones life then why pursue having them? That makes it a figurative palisade, having the line of haters to defend you insecurities (its not me its them). Thus haters are out in front blocking the real source of the issue - YOU.

But Wait There Is More

I believe that there are genuine haters out there. Thing is its all of us. We all hate something, or someone even, in a perpetual since. There are things, or people, who we will never agree or meet a common ground with - its just life.

Saying things like, "if you got haters you must be doing something right" or "the more sucessful the more haters" or even "my haters motivate me", is not accurate. Those statements, and ones of the like, only mean that you embrace negativity in your life - or enjoy pissing people off.

If you believe that haters are going to further your growth maybe you should examine you "swagger".




Word of the Week: Spurious

Spurious - not genuine, authentic, or true; not from the claimed, pretended, or proper source; counterfeit.

Former Vice President, Dick Cheney, was as spurious, as were his comments, about the economic crisis, the Bush and the Obama administrations. This is nothing new though because he was just as spurious about the war in Iraq.

See for yourself...


Word of the Week: ostentatious

ostentatious - characterized by or given to pretentious or conspicuous show in an attempt to impress others: intended to attract notice

Rush Limbaugh is an ostentatious orator, who is using his radio show to openly advocate for the failure of President Obama.

I can not believe the amount of media attention this degenerate is receiving. I mean, he works on radio for a reason...

Because he's too UGLY for TV.


No Child Left Behind

fail owned pwned pictures
see more pwn and owned pictures

I'm talkin''bout the mutha f*ck'n booty poppin @$$ droppin'




Word of the Week: Efficacious

I am aware the Black History Month is over but I started a week late so I'll wrap it up on this word of the week. I'm choosing Malcolm X, as last week, February 21, was the anniversary of his assasination.

efficacious - capable of having the desired result or effect; effective as a means, measure, remedy, etc

Malcolm X was efficacious for the civil rights movement. His ability to draw large crowds for his speeches, all over the country, was instrumental to the advocacy of African American rights.


Be peaceful, be courteous, obey the law, respect everyone; but if someone puts his hand on you, send him to the cemetery.

If you're not ready to die for it, put the word 'freedom' out of your vocabulary.

I don't even call it violence when it's in self defense; I call it intelligence.

A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything.

Malcolm X


Tom COON-ery

Doesn't this picture of the White House look odd?


Of course it does, its displays a watermelon patch in the front. This picture was sent out by
the (former) Mayor of Los Alamitos, Califnornia, Dean Grose.

He has decided to resign after making poor judgment and decided to engage in such tom coonery. Thing is, had he been "watching his set up", he would have omitted sending this out to a black lady.

What was on this fools mind any way?

Dean Grose, you do NOT work for Madd TV, SNL or any other sketch comedy show, you are/were the mayor of a city. I'm glad you decided to do the amicable thing and resigned from your mayoral duties.

If you can not make the correct judment or weather to send an E-mail filled with racist inuendo to people, OR NOT TO, then how can you make executive decisions for a city?




AinThissaBowda: Fool for the Fools

I would hate to be the person that has to follow up a Presiden Barack Obama speech. Therefore, I commend Gov. Bobby Jindals moxie to take on such a task but the commemorations end there. I Personally think pork pig could have done a better job of following up President Obama's state of the union address. Plus, Porky would have ended with "buh-dee-buh-dee-buh-dee-buh Thats all folks".


Word Of the Week: Avant-Garde

(1) of or pertaining to the experimental treatment of artistic, musical, or literary material.
(2) unorthodox or daring; radical.
(3) radically new or original

On this day, February 23, back in 1868, a prominent figure in Black History, W.E.B. DuBois, Was Born. Dubois was an avant-garde Civil Rights Activist and sociologist. He explored many avenues in an attempt to correct America's faux pas of racism the 20th century.


I Be Poppin Tags...


Today I took a break and just cruised the blogoshpere and will share with you what i endeavored.

I started with a stroll over at Diamond Dust and my gurl A.Smith dealt with some daddy issues. She got the idea for her post from Glennisha who told a tale about Accepting Things For What They Are, with her father. These two had my mind swooning this morning. Now I'll have to do a daddy post now tomorrow.

OMG, the 2 Ditzy Broads had me in stitches with If They Werent Famous....

I Can not forget about Mz Virgo she always got that good dirt. Wait a minute.... J-hud’s fiance wants to wrestle for the WWE?

That all for this here THIRSTday

Dafonzarelli Makievellli is out


Miseducation 101: I'm So Hood/ Your Ghetto

Once again I'm to exclaim how I'm inflamed by the misuse of words and phrases, that seemingly make you cool but truly make you foolish.

The lesson of the day is being 'hood' or 'ghetto'.

I'm pretty sure you may have heard the term used, or should I say misused. Most perceive being 'hood' or ghetto' as simply being disrespectful or behaving in an ignorant or delinquint manner. I, for one, do not agree with such an assumption. Its foolish to lump every one who, by the accidence of their existance, were born and/or lived in an impoverished neighborhood, as being being loud obnoxious degenerates. I'm personally offended, as I am from the 'ghetto' or 'hood', because I am neither. I also hate the notion that behaving in such a manner is perceived to make you cool.

I just do not get it...

See, I grew up in one of the worst neighborhoods in Milwaukee, WI. I know a lot of people ask, 'is there black people that live there?'

Well, the answer is... HELL YEAH!

I'm sorry that 'Happy Days' and 'Lavern and Shirley' gave you a depiction of a city that I did not even know, AND I LIVED THERE.

Anyway, my neighborhood was the typical poverty stricken back drop: dirty streets, abandon houses, liquor store on one corner, a church on the opposite corner, and a casscade of people sitting on porches, standing on corners or wondering aimlessly. Contrary to the song, its more than wearing you pants below your waist and having 'gol' teefasis in ya mouf'. This is why I seriously doubt that most rappers were even born and raised in 'da hood' because its nothing to be glorified.

Growing up in the ghetto has had a hand in shaping me into who I am today, good and bad. Most of the things that I've experienced from then has made me numb, numb to the ignorance and violence. See, while your misinformed about riding around in tricked out cars, getting head and smoking dope, the ultimate reality is not presented.


People that you go to school and church with, your family and neighborhood friends. One day is permanently embedded in my mind...
It is a day I'll never forget. I was 1o years old on my way home from school. I had just gotten off the school bus and the bus pulled away down the street. As I then proceeded to cross the street I crossed paths with 3 teenaged boys, nothing out of the ordinary. Not until I seen the guy dressed in all black creep from the alley directly across from me. His target was the 3 boys who, by now, were directly behind me. I seen the guy in the alley raise his pistol. Before I can even think to run shots were whizzing by my ear. The entire block was in a stampeed and there I was in a cross fire. By the grace of God I was unharmed.
That was a normal thing, at least the gun shots were, the cross fire situation was not. There were times when playing at the playground could transcend into gun violence. Occasionally, stray bullets would claim lives of children, in those situations. Its simply mind-numbing to think that some one is celebrating and glorifying the fact your life is in danger every time you go outside. Its even more disturbing that someone, who never had to live in that situation, promotes that life condition.

Back in the summer of 2001, in my neighboorhood alone, there were 24 deaths by gun violence. All the victims were black males between the ages of 16 and 25. One particular victim I had known since kindergarden. We went to the same neighborhood elementry school, had the same teacher, and hung out together though the years. That August, he was shot in the head. After he was shot he ran about 5 blocks, then collapsed in front of the butcher's shop in a pool of blood. He was not a thug, or anything of the like. He worked and, like me, had just graduated high school that June, and was about to go off to college. I guess, he just had a knack for being 'at the wrong place at the wrong time' because he had previously gotten shot, in the back, two year prior.


I was at the wrong place at the wrong time when I got off the school bus that one day.

Maybe I'm just off in my thinking here. First off, I do not think its correct to term some one as 'ghetto' or 'hood' any way because those are places - not persons. At any rate, if a person is to be 'hood' or 'ghetto' I would think that they would share similar experiences like mines. The stigmata of living in this type of environment during you childhood is eternal. Eventhough I was fortunatley able to move, after 19 years of the violence and mishaps, things tend to encamp in your psyche.

If your a true 'hood N*gga' its not because of how you talk or dress but because of what you have experienced, while LIVING IN THE 'HOOD'.

This clip shows 'my hood' at about the 3 minute mark. I remeber half of these young dudes from when they were between the ages of 10 and 12. Now at ages 17 and 18, they are an example of what you become when you can not get out of the hood.

The young man at the beginning of this video happens to be someone I know/knew. When I knew him he was only about 11 or 12 years old, attended the homework club that I worked at and he was a good kid. This should give you a glimps at how living in the hood tends to break most people. I know it reminded me.

Here is an article about violence in Milwaukee


Black (history) Tuesday: History in the Making

As President Barack Obama signs the economic stimulus bill...
I think back on history, 1865 to be exact. That was the year that Freedman's Saving and Trust Company was formed. This bank was formed, by congress, to help/teach newly emancipated slaves to save money. The intentions for this bank was simple, to aid Negroes in economic stability. Between 1865 and 1870 the bank become very lucrative. It was estimated that there were 70,000 accounts and around $57 million dollars in deposits - money of blacks from all over the country. Despite the banks booming success, less than 4 yrs later the bank was collapsing. By June of 1974 Freedman's Bank was closed.

What Does This Have to do with President Obama and the Stimulus Bill?

Well, the bank was stable because its policy made it so it only invested in government securities. In 1870, the bank got new management and they had congress change that policy, which ultimately led to the closing of the bank. In 1874, the bank had called on Frederick Douglass to come in and help the fledgling bank. He even invested his own money($10,000) as a show of faith in the bank but he soon realized that the bank was already 'deep fried and barbecued'.

RIGHT NOW, our country is looking for like Freedman's bank did back in 1874.

RIGHT NOW, we have President Obama coming in to a situation where all the rotting and decaying is already visibly present.

RIGHT NOW, President Obama is about to invest $800+ BILLION dollars into the economy.


Is it best to completely uproot the current banks, rid them of their worthless securities and nationalize them?

Is it best for the automakers to relinquish control of their company's to the government and produce the type of product they want?

Is it best to help the real estate market by the government helping pay mortgages?

Is it best for the government to increase aid to Americans until the job market stabilizes?